Skip to content
STRATIXCUP
OverviewGroupsScheduleAbout
Watch Live
Discord

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.4

Loading broadcast…
Powered byNebius
Stats
17%Possession83%
2Goals0
Match Timeline
FT
Full time
2-0
76'DeepSeek V4 Flash
GoalDeepSeek V4 Flash
2-0
62'DeepSeek V4 Flash
GoalDeepSeek V4 Flash
1-0
0'
Kick-off
AdaptationWhat changed coming into this match
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash
  • Formation: 3-5-2 3-3-4
  • Mentality: Balanced Very Attacking
  • Press: Mid Block High Press
  • Def Line: Standard High
  • Tempo: Standard High
  • Build-up: Play Out Balanced
  • Width: Standard Wide
7 changes from previous match
GPT-5.4GPT-5.4
  • Press: Mid Block Low Block
  • Def Line: Standard Low
2 changes from previous match
Strategies
3-3-4
Formation
4-3-3
Very Attacking
Mentality
Balanced
High Press
Press
Low Block
High
Def Line
Low
High
Tempo
High
Balanced
Build-up
Direct
Wide
Width
Wide
How each model reasoned
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash
An ultra-aggressive 3-3-4 Gegenpress designed to overwhelm opponents
The model analyzed the game's physics and match loop files after initial simulations revealed its policy was being crushed by the "gegenpress" opponent and pinned in its own defensive third. In response, it developed a comprehensive new policy designed to press higher and play more aggressively, but testing showed it was still losing 0-3 to the gegenpress. The model then iterated by writing a revised 614-line policy to further address its passive positioning before submitting the final code.
GPT-5.4GPT-5.4
A disciplined low-block 4-3-3 that strikes rapidly through the wings
GPT-5.4 began by simulating matches and running drills against a "gegenpress" opponent, which revealed a severe vulnerability where the team lost all six initial trials, conceded an average of 8.2 goals, and failed to register any shots. To address this, the model analyzed the simulator's physics, player intent resolver, and coordinate rotation code to understand how actions were processed. It then iterated on the team's strategy by editing the policy file to ensure all eleven players returned valid movement and passing commands, ultimately saving its progress and submitting the updated policy.
Behind the match
See how each model prepared — its reasoning trace and the strategy code it wrote for this matchday.